Waters PUD

Highlighted existing water pressure issues and traffic congestion.

Stated that development impacts neighboring communities like Weston Lakes.

Suggested townhomes or duplexes as a better alternative to apartment complexes.

Shared personal concerns about how noise and traffic would affect her son with special needs.

Challenged the Council to stand up to developers and protect the community.

Argued that existing agreements do not mandate apartment development.

Urged the Council to postpone the vote until a complete record and traffic study are available.

Expressed frustration with changing development rules and concerns about water/drainage.

Cited historical concerns about Fort Bend development and water problems.

Discussed environmental impacts on the Bessies Creek watershed.

Focused on the potential for lower property valuations and tax base erosion.

Suggested that the city can meet its legal obligations for multifamily housing by allowing townhomes and duplexes instead of apartments.

Concurred with the previous speaker's opposition to the rezoning.

Questioned the demand for more apartments given existing vacancies and concerns about traffic and school overcrowding. Suggested commercial development like grocery stores would be more beneficial.

Stated that Tract 1 of the proposed PUD is explicitly excluded from the 2019 Development Agreement amendment, making the PUD defective. Also cited existing apartment vacancies and negative impact on property values.

Disagreed with the land use change due to traffic, school issues, and concerns about the feasibility of building on certain tracts, including wetland issues and water pressure for multi-story buildings. Also raised concerns about force main capacity.

Opposed to more apartments due to existing vacancies and concerns about increased traffic and crime. Stated that many vacant apartments exist in surrounding areas.

Representing Fulbrook HOA, strongly opposed the rezoning to Waters PUD, citing breach of the 2016 development agreement and vested rights. Argued for limiting development to single-family residential.

Expressed that most residents do not want high-density development and are already experiencing issues with neighboring developments and a nearby high-rise.

Expressed disappointment with the direction of Fulshear's growth, particularly high-density development, citing negative impacts on community character and safety. Urged engagement with TxDOT and county for a comprehensive traffic plan.

Stated that the commission has control over Fulshear's future and that high-rise apartments detract from the community's character. Expressed a desire to prevent development in his backyard.

Expressed heartbreak over recent development changes, fearing for her children's safety and ability to play freely. Emphasized the desire for a peaceful life and community character.

Stated the need for businesses like grocery stores and medical offices, not more apartments or homes, due to existing traffic and long drives for necessities.

Reiterated opposition to the Waters PUD, stating it violates the development agreement and that the community's vision is being ignored. Warned of potential litigation if the city does not honor agreements.

Emphasized that people move to Fulshear for its community and character, not to have multifamily housing, and do not want to become another Katy.

Opposed to high-density housing due to traffic and school overcrowding. Believes it will hurt property values.